What to Expect During a Microsoft Licensing Audit

Akins IT • March 28, 2016
Connect with us

Unless self executed, ‘audit’ is never a good word. Many software vendors including Adobe, IBM, and Oracle conduct audits on licensing products, including Microsoft. In fact, 58% of surveyed executives reported that they had been audited by Microsoft in the last 12 months. If your company has been or is the subject of an audit or licensing compliance review, you should weigh heavily which system attributes need to be prepared for the audit. 



 Microsoft may initiate an audit in several ways including a letter or email to the company requesting that it do a self-audit and reply via email verifying that it believes it is compliant, a letter or email from the US SAM team requesting the company go through a formal SAM engagement, or a letter or email from Microsoft Legal and Corporate Affairs or the Licensing, Contract, and Compliance team. Audits can be somewhat time consuming and Microsoft generally gives between 15-30 days to complete the process. It is common for Microsoft to approach you as a customer requesting that you initially conduct a self-audit. The self-audits can consist of the following: 


  • Determining what software you actually own- i.e. License Entitlements
  • Reports of software actually deployed
  • The License Entitlements assigned to these deployments.


The best way to approach a compliance review is to treat it as an ongoing rather than single event. In other words, companies should create a process for ongoing software asset management which would involve not only the IT department but also a number of other departments including purchasing. In particular, it may be helpful to pull a Microsoft Volume Licensing (MLS) statement to recognize areas of non-compliance.

By Shawn Akins October 20, 2025
October 20, 2025 — Early today, Amazon Web Services experienced a major incident centered in its US‑EAST‑1 (N. Virginia) region. AWS reports the event began around 12:11 a.m. PT and tied back to DNS resolution affecting DynamoDB , with mitigation within a couple of hours and recovery continuing thereafter. As the outage rippled, popular services like Snapchat, Venmo, Ring, Roblox, Fortnite , and even some Amazon properties saw disruptions before recovering. If your apps or data are anchored to a single cloud, a morning like this can turn into a help‑desk fire drill. A multi‑cloud or cloud‑smart approach helps you ride through these moments with minimal end‑user impact. What happened (and why it matters) Single‑region fragility: US‑EAST‑1 is massive—and when it sneezes, the internet catches a cold. Incidents here have a history of wide blast radius. Shared dependencies: DNS issues to core services (like DynamoDB endpoints) can cascade across workloads that never directly “touch” that service. Multi‑cloud: practical resilience, not buzzwords For mid‑sized orgs, schools, and local government, multi‑cloud doesn’t have to mean “every app in every cloud.” It means thoughtful redundancy where it counts : Multi‑region or multi‑provider failover for critical apps Run active/standby across AWS and Azure (or another provider), or at least across two AWS regions with automated failover. Start with citizen‑facing portals, SIS/LMS access, emergency comms, and payment gateways. Portable platforms Use Kubernetes and containers, keep state externalized, and standardize infra with Terraform/Ansible so you can redeploy fast when a region (or a provider) wobbles. (Today’s DNS hiccup is exactly the kind of scenario this protects against.) Resilient data layers Replicate data asynchronously across clouds/regions; choose databases with cross‑region failover and test RPO/RTO quarterly. If you rely on a managed database tied to one region, design an escape hatch. Traffic and identity that float Use global traffic managers/DNS to shift users automatically; keep identity (MFA/SSO) highly available and not hard‑wired to a single provider’s control plane. Run the playbook Document health checks, automated cutover, and comms templates. Then practice —tabletops and live failovers. Many services today recovered within hours, but only teams with rehearsed playbooks avoided user‑visible downtime. The bottom line Cloud concentration risk is real. Outages will happen—what matters is whether your constituents, students, and staff feel it. A pragmatic multi‑cloud stance limits the blast radius and keeps your mission‑critical services online when one provider has a bad day. Need a resilience check? Akins IT can help you prioritize which systems should be multi‑cloud, design the right level of redundancy, and validate your failover plan—without overspending. Let’s start with a quick, 30‑minute review of your most critical services and RPO/RTO targets. (No slideware, just actionable next steps.)
By Shawn Akins October 13, 2025
How a Zero-Day in GoAnywhere MFT Sparked a Ransomware Wave—and What Mid-Sized IT Leaders Must Do Now
By Shawn Akins October 13, 2025
The clock is ticking: Learn your options for Windows 11 migration, Extended Security Updates, and cost‑smart strategies before support ends.
More Posts